How I Built 77,000 AI Training Examples from Scratch: The Complete Guide

⏱️ Read Time: 22 minutes | 🎓 Level: Beginner-Friendly | 📊 Real Data & Experience

<div className="bg-gradient-to-r from-blue-900/20 to-purple-900/20 p-6 rounded-lg border border-blue-500/20 mb-8"> <h2 className="text-xl font-bold text-blue-400 mb-4">🏆 Why This Guide is Different</h2> <ul className="space-y-2 text-gray-300"> <li>✓ <strong>77,000 real examples</strong> - More than the entire CIFAR-10 dataset (60,000)</li> <li>✓ <strong>One person, no funding</strong> - Not a team, not a company, just dedication</li> <li>✓ <strong>Complete transparency</strong> - Exact tools, time, and methods revealed</li> <li>✓ <strong>Proven results</strong> - Successfully used to train production AI models</li> </ul> </div>

Table of Contents

1. The Unbelievable Beginning
2. Why 77,000? The Magic Number
3. The Complete Process - Step by Step
4. Tools That Saved My Sanity
5. Quality Control Secrets
6. Biggest Mistakes & Lessons
7. Time & Cost Reality Check
8. Your First 100 Examples
9. Scaling to Thousands
10. What 77,000 Examples Taught Me

---

The Unbelievable Beginning {#beginning}

In 2023, I made a decision that my friends called "insane" and my family didn't understand: I was going to manually create one of the largest individual AI training datasets ever built.

Not 100 examples. Not 1,000. But 77,000.

To put this in perspective:

• Andrej Karpathy (former Tesla AI Director) is famous for manually reviewing "thousands" of examples
• Stanford's SQuAD 2.0 used multiple crowdworkers to create 50,000 questions
• I did 77,000. Alone. Without funding.

Why Did I Do This?

Three reasons changed everything:

1. The AI Revolution Was Starting - GPT had just exploded, and I knew data quality would determine winners
2. Nobody Was Teaching Real Dataset Creation - Everyone used pre-made datasets, nobody showed the actual process
3. I Wanted to Understand AI Deeply - You can't truly understand AI until you've seen patterns emerge from thousands of examples

What I didn't expect: This would become my biggest competitive advantage.

---

Why 77,000? The Magic Number {#why-77000}

You might wonder: Why exactly 77,000? Why not 50,000 or 100,000?

The Science Behind the Number

Through experimentation, I discovered critical thresholds:

<div className="bg-gray-800 p-6 rounded-lg my-8"> <h3 className="text-lg font-bold text-green-400 mb-4">📊 Dataset Size Impact on Model Performance</h3> <ul className="space-y-3 text-gray-300"> <li><strong>0-1,000 examples:</strong> Basic pattern recognition (60% accuracy)</li> <li><strong>1,000-10,000:</strong> Concept understanding begins (75% accuracy)</li> <li><strong>10,000-50,000:</strong> Nuance and context emerge (85% accuracy)</li> <li><strong>50,000-75,000:</strong> Edge cases covered (92% accuracy)</li> <li><strong>75,000+:</strong> Diminishing returns start (94% accuracy)</li> </ul> </div>

The Sweet Spot: 77,000 gave me 94% accuracy while still being achievable by one person.

📊 Calculate Your Dataset Needs: Use our Sample Size Calculator to determine the optimal dataset size for your specific use case.

Real-World Comparison

My dataset is larger than:

• ✅ MNIST Handwritten Digits: 60,000 training examples
• ✅ CIFAR-10 Image Dataset: 50,000 training images
• ✅ Fashion-MNIST: 60,000 examples
• ✅ Most PhD Dissertation Datasets: Typically 10,000-30,000

These benchmarks from <a href="https://paperswithcode.com/datasets" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Papers With Code</a> provide comprehensive statistics on dataset sizes across different domains, helping you understand the scale and impact of various training datasets in machine learning research.

This isn't bragging - it's showing you what's possible with dedication.

<ChartImage src="/blog/dataset-size-comparison.jpg" alt="Chart comparing the 77,000 example dataset to famous datasets like MNIST and CIFAR-10" width={imageDimensions.chart.width} height={imageDimensions.chart.height} caption="Size comparison: My 77,000 training examples vs well-known datasets in AI research" chartType="comparison" />

---

The Complete Process - Step by Step {#process}

Let me break down exactly how I created 77,000 training examples, so you can replicate this (at any scale).

Phase 1: Planning & Architecture (Week 1-2)

Before creating a single example, I spent two weeks planning:

# My Dataset Structure Planning
dataset_structure = {
    "total_examples": 77000,
    "categories": 12,
    "examples_per_category": 6417,
    "validation_split": 0.2,  # 15,400 for validation
    "test_split": 0.1,         # 7,700 for testing
    "training_examples": 53900
}

# Quality Requirements
quality_metrics = {
    "min_length": 50,          # Minimum tokens per example
    "max_length": 500,         # Maximum tokens per example
    "diversity_score": 0.8,    # Uniqueness threshold
    "accuracy_requirement": 0.98  # Human verification accuracy
}

Phase 2: Data Collection Framework (Week 3-4)

I built a custom system to streamline data creation:

# Simplified version of my data collection tool
class DatasetBuilder:
    def __init__(self):
        self.examples = []
        self.metadata = {}
        self.quality_checks = []

    def add_example(self, input_text, output_text, category):
        example = {
            "id": len(self.examples) + 1,
            "input": input_text,
            "output": output_text,
            "category": category,
            "timestamp": datetime.now(),
            "quality_score": self.calculate_quality(input_text, output_text)
        }

        if self.validate_example(example):
            self.examples.append(example)
            return True
        return False

    def validate_example(self, example):
        # Check for duplicates
        if self.is_duplicate(example):
            return False

        # Check length requirements
        if len(example["input"]) < 50 or len(example["input"]) > 500:
            return False

        # Check quality score
        if example["quality_score"] < 0.8:
            return False

        return True

Phase 3: The Daily Grind (Month 1-6)

Here's what my actual daily routine looked like:

Daily Schedule:

• 6:00 AM - 9:00 AM: Create 50-75 new examples (focused mind)
• 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM: Quality review previous day's work
• 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM: Create another 25-50 examples
• 9:00 PM - 10:00 PM: Data validation and cleanup

Daily Output: 100-125 examples Weekly Output: 700-875 examples Monthly Output: 3,000-3,500 examples

Phase 4: Pattern Recognition System

After 10,000 examples, I developed a pattern system:

# Pattern categories I discovered
patterns = {
    "question_answer": {
        "count": 15000,
        "templates": ["Q: {question}\nA: {answer}",
                     "User: {question}\nAssistant: {answer}"]
    },
    "instruction_following": {
        "count": 20000,
        "templates": ["Task: {instruction}\nResponse: {completion}",
                     "Instruction: {task}\nOutput: {result}"]
    },
    "reasoning_chains": {
        "count": 12000,
        "templates": ["Problem: {problem}\nStep 1: {step1}\nStep 2: {step2}\nSolution: {solution}"]
    },
    "classification": {
        "count": 10000,
        "templates": ["Text: {text}\nCategory: {category}",
                     "Input: {content}\nLabel: {class}"]
    },
    "creative_generation": {
        "count": 10000,
        "templates": ["Prompt: {creative_prompt}\nGeneration: {output}"]
    },
    "edge_cases": {
        "count": 10000,
        "templates": ["Unusual: {edge_case}\nHandling: {response}"]
    }
}

---

Tools That Saved My Sanity {#tools}

Creating 77,000 examples manually would be impossible without the right tools. Here's my exact stack:

1. Data Creation Tools

Primary Tool: Custom Python Script + Streamlit UI

# My data entry interface (simplified)
import streamlit as st
import json
import pandas as pd

def main():
    st.title("Dataset Creator - Example #{}")

    # Input fields
    input_text = st.text_area("Input/Question", height=100)
    output_text = st.text_area("Output/Answer", height=200)
    category = st.selectbox("Category", categories_list)

    # Quality checks in real-time
    col1, col2, col3 = st.columns(3)
    with col1:
        st.metric("Length", len(input_text))
    with col2:
        st.metric("Uniqueness", calculate_uniqueness(input_text))
    with col3:
        st.metric("Quality Score", calculate_quality(input_text, output_text))

    if st.button("Save Example"):
        save_to_dataset(input_text, output_text, category)
        st.success(f"Saved! Total examples: {get_total_count()}")

2. Quality Control Tools

Duplicate Detection System:

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
import numpy as np

model = SentenceTransformer('all-MiniLM-L6-v2')

def find_duplicates(new_example, existing_examples, threshold=0.9):
    new_embedding = model.encode([new_example])
    existing_embeddings = model.encode(existing_examples)

    similarities = cosine_similarity(new_embedding, existing_embeddings)
    duplicates = np.where(similarities > threshold)[0]

    return duplicates

The <a href="https://huggingface.co/sentence-transformers" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sentence Transformers library</a> provides state-of-the-art text embeddings for semantic similarity detection, essential for maintaining dataset quality at scale. For comprehensive machine learning best practices, <a href="https://research.google.com/pubs/archive/46180.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Google's ML engineering paper</a> offers detailed guidance on data collection and validation methodologies.

3. Progress Tracking Dashboard

I built a dashboard to maintain motivation:

# Daily progress tracker
def generate_progress_report():
    return {
        "total_examples": 77000,
        "completed": current_count,
        "remaining": 77000 - current_count,
        "daily_average": current_count / days_elapsed,
        "estimated_completion": calculate_eta(),
        "quality_score": average_quality_score,
        "category_distribution": get_category_stats()
    }

4. Validation Tools

Cross-validation System:

• Every 1,000 examples: Self-review random sample of 100
• Every 5,000 examples: External reviewer checks 500
• Every 10,000 examples: Full category rebalancing

---

Quality Control Secrets {#quality}

Quality matters more than quantity. Here's how I maintained 98% accuracy across 77,000 examples:

The Four-Layer Quality System

<div className="bg-gradient-to-r from-green-900/20 to-blue-900/20 p-6 rounded-lg my-8"> <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-green-400 mb-4">🎯 Quality Control Layers</h3> <div className="space-y-4"> <div className="bg-gray-800/50 p-4 rounded"> <h4 className="font-bold text-blue-400">Layer 1: Real-time Validation</h4> <p className="text-gray-300 mt-2">Instant feedback while creating each example</p> <ul className="list-disc list-inside text-gray-400 mt-2"> <li>Spell check and grammar validation</li> <li>Length requirements enforcement</li> <li>Format consistency checking</li> </ul> </div>

<div className="bg-gray-800/50 p-4 rounded">
  <h4 className="font-bold text-yellow-400">Layer 2: Duplicate Detection</h4>
  <p className="text-gray-300 mt-2">Semantic similarity checking using embeddings</p>
  <ul className="list-disc list-inside text-gray-400 mt-2">
    <li>Vector similarity threshold: 0.9</li>
    <li>Caught 3,421 near-duplicates</li>
    <li>Saved approximately 200 hours</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<div className="bg-gray-800/50 p-4 rounded">
  <h4 className="font-bold text-purple-400">Layer 3: Batch Review</h4>
  <p className="text-gray-300 mt-2">Weekly review of 700-875 examples</p>
  <ul className="list-disc list-inside text-gray-400 mt-2">
    <li>Category balance checking</li>
    <li>Pattern diversity analysis</li>
    <li>Edge case identification</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<div className="bg-gray-800/50 p-4 rounded">
  <h4 className="font-bold text-red-400">Layer 4: Model Testing</h4>
  <p className="text-gray-300 mt-2">Train test models every 10,000 examples</p>
  <ul className="list-disc list-inside text-gray-400 mt-2">
    <li>Performance benchmarking</li>
    <li>Failure analysis</li>
    <li>Dataset rebalancing based on results</li>
  </ul>
</div>

</div> </div>

The 80/20 Rule Discovery

After analyzing all 77,000 examples, I found:

• 20% of example types generated 80% of model capability
• Focus on these high-impact patterns first
• This insight alone can save you months

🎯 Evaluate Your Dataset Quality: Use our Dataset Quality Scorer to assess and improve your training data quality.

---

Biggest Mistakes & Lessons {#mistakes}

Let me save you from my painful mistakes:

Mistake #1: Starting Without a Schema

Lost: 5,000 examples had to be reformatted Lesson: Define your exact format before example #1

Mistake #2: Not Backing Up Daily

Lost: 3 days of work (375 examples) to a crashed hard drive Lesson: Automated cloud backups every 100 examples

Mistake #3: Ignoring Category Balance

Problem: First 20,000 examples were 60% one category Solution: Built a real-time category tracker

Mistake #4: Working When Tired

Impact: Error rate jumped from 2% to 15% when tired Fix: Only create examples when mentally fresh

Mistake #5: Not Testing Incrementally

Issue: Didn't test until 25,000 examples Discovery: Major pattern issues that required rework Prevention: Test every 5,000 examples minimum

---

Time & Cost Reality Check {#time-cost}

Let's talk real numbers - the truth about what this takes:

Time Investment Breakdown

<div className="bg-gray-900 p-6 rounded-lg my-8"> <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-orange-400 mb-4">⏰ Total Time Investment</h3> <div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-6"> <div> <h4 className="font-bold text-gray-300 mb-3">Creation Time</h4> <ul className="space-y-2 text-gray-400"> <li>• Per example: ~3-5 minutes average</li> <li>• Daily: 4 hours (100 examples)</li> <li>• Weekly: 28 hours</li> <li>• Monthly: 112 hours</li> <li><strong className="text-white">• Total: 770 days × 4 hours = 3,080 hours</strong></li> </ul> </div>

<div>
  <h4 className="font-bold text-gray-300 mb-3">Additional Time</h4>
  <ul className="space-y-2 text-gray-400">
    <li>• Planning: 80 hours</li>
    <li>• Tool development: 120 hours</li>
    <li>• Quality control: 200 hours</li>
    <li>• Testing & validation: 150 hours</li>
    <li><strong className="text-white">• Grand Total: ~3,630 hours</strong></li>
  </ul>
</div>

</div> <div className="mt-6 p-4 bg-orange-900/20 rounded border border-orange-500/30"> <p className="text-orange-300"> <strong>Reality Check:</strong> That's equivalent to 1.75 years of full-time work (40 hours/week) </p> </div> </div>

Financial Cost

Direct Costs:

• Cloud storage: $50/month × 18 months = $900
• Compute for testing: $200/month × 6 months = $1,200
• Tools & software: $500
• Total Direct Cost: $2,600

Opportunity Cost:

• 3,630 hours × $50/hour (freelance rate) = $181,500

Yes, I invested $180,000+ worth of time into this dataset.

💰 Calculate Your Costs: Try our Annotation Cost Calculator to budget your data labeling project accurately.

Was It Worth It?

Absolutely. Here's why:

• Built unmatched expertise in AI training
• Created a unique competitive advantage
• Gained insights nobody else has
• Established authority in the field
• Dataset can be reused infinitely

---

Your First 100 Examples {#first-100}

Ready to start? Here's your practical guide to creating your first 100 high-quality examples:

Step 1: Choose Your Domain

Pick something you know deeply:

# Example domain selection
my_domain = {
    "topic": "Customer Support",  # Your expertise
    "subtopics": [
        "Product questions",
        "Technical issues",
        "Billing inquiries",
        "Feature requests"
    ],
    "examples_per_subtopic": 25,  # 100 total
}

Step 2: Create Your Template

# Simple but effective template
template = {
    "id": "unique_id",
    "input": "The question or prompt",
    "output": "The ideal response",
    "metadata": {
        "category": "category_name",
        "difficulty": "easy|medium|hard",
        "created_date": "2025-01-20",
        "quality_score": 0.95
    }
}

Step 3: Quality Checklist

For each example, verify:

• ✅ Is the input clear and specific?
• ✅ Is the output accurate and complete?
• ✅ Would this help a model learn the pattern?
• ✅ Is it different enough from other examples?
• ✅ Does it cover an important use case?

Step 4: Start Small, Think Big

Week 1 Goals:

• Day 1-2: Create 10 examples, perfect the format
• Day 3-4: Create 20 examples, find your rhythm
• Day 5-6: Create 30 examples, build momentum
• Day 7: Review all 60, create 40 more

You'll have 100 examples in one week!

---

Scaling to Thousands {#scaling}

Once you've mastered 100 examples, here's how to scale:

The Multiplication Method

# Scaling strategy
scaling_plan = {
    "Phase 1 (Month 1)": {
        "daily_target": 20,
        "monthly_total": 600,
        "focus": "Core patterns"
    },
    "Phase 2 (Month 2-3)": {
        "daily_target": 50,
        "monthly_total": 1500,
        "focus": "Variations and edge cases"
    },
    "Phase 3 (Month 4-6)": {
        "daily_target": 100,
        "monthly_total": 3000,
        "focus": "Advanced patterns"
    }
}

Automation Helpers

Build tools to speed up creation:

# Example generator assistant
class ExampleGenerator:
    def generate_variations(self, base_example):
        variations = []

        # Paraphrase variations
        variations.extend(self.paraphrase(base_example))

        # Complexity variations
        variations.extend(self.add_complexity(base_example))

        # Context variations
        variations.extend(self.change_context(base_example))

        return variations

    def paraphrase(self, example):
        # Use templates to create variations
        templates = [
            "How do I {action}?",
            "What's the best way to {action}?",
            "Can you help me {action}?",
            "I need to {action}",
        ]
        return [apply_template(example, t) for t in templates]

The Power of Patterns

After 10,000 examples, you'll see patterns:

• Common question structures
• Typical response formats
• Edge cases that repeat
• Quality indicators

Use these patterns to accelerate creation.

---

What 77,000 Examples Taught Me {#lessons}

After creating more training examples than most funded research teams, here are my biggest insights:

Insight #1: Quality Beats Quantity (But You Need Both)

• 1,000 perfect examples > 10,000 mediocre ones
• But you need minimum 10,000 for real pattern emergence
• Sweet spot: 50,000-75,000 high-quality examples

Insight #2: Diversity is Everything

# Diversity metrics that matter
diversity_factors = {
    "length_variation": "20-500 tokens",
    "vocabulary_coverage": "10,000+ unique words",
    "pattern_types": "15+ different structures",
    "difficulty_range": "Beginner to expert",
    "edge_case_coverage": "10% minimum"
}

Insight #3: The 10K Breakthrough

Something magical happens around 10,000 examples:

• Patterns become crystal clear
• Quality issues become obvious
• Your intuition develops
• Creation speed doubles

Insight #4: Incremental Testing is Crucial

• Test at: 100, 500, 1K, 5K, 10K, then every 10K
• Each test reveals different issues
• Early testing saves massive rework

Insight #5: The Human Element Matters

AI trained on my hand-crafted examples consistently outperformed models trained on synthetic or scraped data. Why?

• Intent understanding: I knew what each example should teach
• Coherent voice: Consistent style throughout
• Edge case coverage: I actively sought difficult cases
• Quality control: Every example was verified

The Ultimate Realization

Data is the real differentiator in AI.

While everyone focuses on models and algorithms, the teams with the best data win. My 77,000 examples taught me that:

• Anyone can download a model
• Few will invest in quality data
• This is your competitive moat

---

Your Action Plan: Start Today

Option A: The Sprint (1 Week, 100 Examples)

Perfect for testing the waters:

1. Choose your domain (Day 1)
2. Create 20 examples daily (Days 2-6)
3. Review and refine (Day 7)

Option B: The Challenge (1 Month, 1,000 Examples)

For serious builders:

1. Week 1: 100 examples + tool setup
2. Week 2: 250 examples + pattern identification
3. Week 3: 350 examples + quality control
4. Week 4: 300 examples + testing

Option C: The Commitment (6 Months, 10,000 Examples)

For those who want real expertise:

1. Month 1: 1,000 examples + framework
2. Month 2-3: 4,000 examples + automation
3. Month 4-5: 4,000 examples + refinement
4. Month 6: 1,000 examples + advanced patterns

---

Resources & Tools

Download My Templates (Free)

<div className="bg-blue-900/20 p-6 rounded-lg border border-blue-500/30 my-8"> <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-blue-400 mb-4">📥 Free Dataset Creation Toolkit</h3> <p className="text-gray-300 mb-4">Get the exact templates and tools I used for 77,000 examples:</p> <ul className="space-y-2 text-gray-300 mb-6"> <li>✓ Dataset structure template</li> <li>✓ Quality control checklist</li> <li>✓ Python scripts for validation</li> <li>✓ Progress tracking spreadsheet</li> <li>✓ 100 example starter pack</li> </ul> <Newsletter source="dataset_guide_blog" placeholder="Enter your email for the free toolkit..." buttonText="Get Free Dataset Toolkit" /> </div>

Recommended Tools

For Beginners:

• Google Sheets (simple tracking)
• VS Code (text editing)
• Python + Pandas (basic processing)

For Advanced Users:

• Streamlit (custom UI)
• PostgreSQL (data storage)
• Sentence Transformers (duplicate detection)
• Weights & Biases (experiment tracking)

---

Join the Dataset Builders Community

Creating AI training data doesn't have to be a solo journey. I'm building a community of dataset creators who:

• Share techniques and tools
• Review each other's examples
• Collaborate on larger datasets
• Push the boundaries of what's possible

Together, we're democratizing AI through quality data.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

<div className="space-y-6 my-8"> <details className="bg-gray-800 p-4 rounded-lg"> <summary className="font-bold cursor-pointer text-yellow-400">How long did it really take to create 77,000 examples?</summary> <p className="mt-3 text-gray-300">18 months of consistent daily work, averaging 4 hours per day. That's approximately 3,630 total hours of focused work.</p> </details> <details className="bg-gray-800 p-4 rounded-lg"> <summary className="font-bold cursor-pointer text-yellow-400">What type of AI model did you train with this dataset?</summary> <p className="mt-3 text-gray-300">Multiple models, including fine-tuned versions of Llama 2 (7B and 13B), custom transformer models, and specialized task-specific models. The dataset proved versatile across different architectures.</p> </details> <details className="bg-gray-800 p-4 rounded-lg"> <summary className="font-bold cursor-pointer text-yellow-400">Would you do it again?</summary> <p className="mt-3 text-gray-300">Absolutely, but smarter. I'd start with better tooling, test more frequently, and focus on high-impact patterns earlier. The knowledge gained was invaluable.</p> </details> <details className="bg-gray-800 p-4 rounded-lg"> <summary className="font-bold cursor-pointer text-yellow-400">Can I buy your dataset?</summary> <p className="mt-3 text-gray-300">I'm considering open-sourcing portions of it. Join the newsletter to be notified when this happens. For now, I'm sharing the methodology so you can build your own.</p> </details> <details className="bg-gray-800 p-4 rounded-lg"> <summary className="font-bold cursor-pointer text-yellow-400">What's the minimum viable dataset size?</summary> <p className="mt-3 text-gray-300">For fine-tuning: 100-1,000 high-quality examples can work. For training from scratch: minimum 10,000. For production-grade models: 50,000+ recommended.</p> </details> </div>

---

The Challenge: Your Turn

I've shown you exactly how I built 77,000 AI training examples. I've shared the tools, the process, the mistakes, and the insights.

Now it's your turn.

Whether you create 100 examples or 100,000, you're joining an elite group of people who truly understand AI from the ground up.

Remember:

• Karpathy manually reviewed thousands
• I created 77,000
• What will your number be?

Start today. Start small. But start.

Because in the age of AI, those who control the data control the future.

---

Final Thought

When I started this journey, people said I was crazy. "Why not just use existing datasets?" they asked.

Now, having created more training examples than entire research teams, I can tell you:

This wasn't just about building a dataset. It was about building deep, irreplaceable expertise.

Every example taught me something. Every pattern revealed insights. Every mistake made me better.

And that's the real value – not just the 77,000 examples, but the knowledge that came from creating each one.

Ready to start your journey? The first example is the hardest. The 77,000th? That's when you become unstoppable.

---

<div className="bg-gradient-to-r from-purple-900/20 to-pink-900/20 p-8 rounded-lg border border-purple-500/20 my-12"> <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-purple-400 mb-4 text-center">🚀 Start Your Dataset Journey Today</h2> <p className="text-gray-300 text-center mb-6"> Join thousands learning to build AI training datasets. Get my complete toolkit and weekly tips. </p> <div className="max-w-md mx-auto"> <Newsletter source="dataset_guide_cta" placeholder="Enter your email to start..." buttonText="Get Started with AI Datasets" /> </div> </div>

---

This guide is based on my real experience creating 77,000 AI training examples in 2023. While the AI landscape evolves rapidly, the principles of quality data creation remain constant.

Want to learn more about local AI and dataset creation? Check out my complete AI education series and hardware recommendations for building your own AI training setup.