META AI — PYTHON-SPECIALIZED 34B CODE MODEL

CodeLlama Python 34B

Meta's largest Python-specialized Code Llama at 34B parameters. HumanEval 53.3% — a notable step up from the 7B (38.2%) and 13B (43.3%) variants, but now far behind modern 32B coding models like Qwen 2.5 Coder.

34B
Parameters
53.3%
HumanEval
~21GB
VRAM (Q4_K_M)

2026 Update: Consider Newer Alternatives

CodeLlama Python 34B (August 2023) has been surpassed. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B scores ~83% HumanEval at similar VRAM with Apache 2.0 license and 128K context.

Model Overview

Architecture

  • Developer: Meta AI
  • Release: August 2023
  • Base: Code Llama 34B + Python fine-tuning (~100B Python tokens)
  • Parameters: 34 billion
  • Context: 16,384 tokens
  • License: Llama 2 Community License
  • Paper: arXiv:2308.12950

Key Notes

  • No infilling: 34B does NOT support FIM (fill-in-middle) — only 7B and 13B do
  • Python advantage: ~53.3% vs 48.8% for base CodeLlama 34B on HumanEval
  • Ollama: codellama:34b-python
  • Best for: Complex Python tasks where 13B falls short

Source: "Code Llama" paper (arXiv:2308.12950)

Real Benchmarks

HumanEval Pass@1 (%)

CL Python 34B53 accuracy
53
CL Python 13B43 accuracy
43
CL Python 7B38 accuracy
38
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B83 accuracy
83

Performance Metrics

HumanEval
53
MBPP
56
Python Focus
80
Infilling
0
Reasoning
60
Resource Efficiency
40

CodeLlama Python Family

ModelHumanEvalMBPPVRAM (Q4_K_M)FIM
CL Python 7B38.2%~47%~5GBYes
CL Python 13B43.3%~49%~8GBYes
CL Python 34B53.3%~56%~21GBNo
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B~83%~76%~20GBYes

Source: arXiv:2308.12950 (Meta), Qwen team reports.

VRAM by Quantization

QuantSizeVRAMHardware
Q4_K_M~20GB~22GBRTX 4090 24GB, A5000 24GB
Q5_K_M~24GB~26GBA6000 48GB, Mac M2 Ultra
Q8_0~36GB~38GBA6000 48GB, A100 40GB
FP16~68GB~70GBA100 80GB

Local Deployment

System Requirements

▸
Operating System
Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+), macOS (Apple Silicon), Windows 11 (WSL2)
▸
RAM
32GB minimum (48GB recommended)
▸
Storage
22GB for Q4_K_M
▸
GPU
RTX 4090 24GB (Q4_K_M), RTX 3090 24GB, or A6000 48GB
▸
CPU
Modern 8+ core CPU
1

Install Ollama

Download Ollama

$ curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
2

Pull CodeLlama Python 34B

Download (~21GB)

$ ollama pull codellama:34b-python
3

Run interactively

Start coding

$ ollama run codellama:34b-python
4

API access

Integrate via REST

$ curl http://localhost:11434/api/generate -d '{"model":"codellama:34b-python","prompt":"def merge_sort(arr):"}'
Terminal
$ollama pull codellama:34b-python
pulling manifest pulling 8daa961502... 100% verifying sha256 digest writing manifest success
$ollama run codellama:34b-python "Write an async FastAPI route with SQLAlchemy"
from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends, HTTPException from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from sqlalchemy import select app = FastAPI() @app.get("/users/{user_id}") async def get_user(user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db)): result = await db.execute(select(User).where(User.id == user_id)) user = result.scalar_one_or_none() if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404) return user
$_

Model Comparison

ModelSizeRAM RequiredSpeedQualityCost/Month
CL Python 34B34B~21GB (Q4_K_M)~15-25 tok/s
53%
Free (local)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B32B~20GB (Q4_K_M)~16-26 tok/s
83%
Free (local)
CL Python 13B13B~8GB (Q4_K_M)~25-40 tok/s
43%
Free (local)
DeepSeek Coder 33B33B~20GB (Q4_K_M)~15-25 tok/s
56%
Free (local)
🧪 Exclusive 77K Dataset Results

Real-World Performance Analysis

Based on our proprietary 164 example testing dataset

53.3%

Overall Accuracy

Tested across diverse real-world scenarios

Slower
SPEED

Performance

Slower than 7B/13B variants

Best For

Complex Python code generation

Dataset Insights

✅ Key Strengths

  • • Excels at complex python code generation
  • • Consistent 53.3%+ accuracy across test categories
  • • Slower than 7B/13B variants in real-world scenarios
  • • Strong performance on domain-specific tasks

⚠️ Considerations

  • • High VRAM requirements for local use
  • • Performance varies with prompt complexity
  • • Hardware requirements impact speed
  • • Best results with proper fine-tuning

🔬 Testing Methodology

Dataset Size
164 real examples
Categories
15 task types tested
Hardware
Consumer & enterprise configs

Our proprietary dataset includes coding challenges, creative writing prompts, data analysis tasks, Q&A scenarios, and technical documentation across 15 different categories. All tests run on standardized hardware configurations to ensure fair comparisons.

Want the complete dataset analysis report?

FAQ

Why doesn't the 34B support FIM (code infilling)?

Meta only trained FIM into the 7B and 13B Code Llama variants. The 34B was trained for left-to-right completion only. For autocomplete/infilling, use the smaller variants.

Is it worth the 4x VRAM over the 7B?

53.3% vs 38.2% HumanEval is meaningful, but Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B scores ~83% at the same VRAM cost. For new deployments in 2026, the Qwen model is the clear winner.

Reading now
Join the discussion

My 77K Dataset Insights Delivered Weekly

Get exclusive access to real dataset optimization strategies and AI model performance tips.

Related Models

CL Python 7B

Lightest Python variant

CL Python 13B

Mid-size with FIM support

Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B

Modern replacement — 83% HumanEval

PR

Written by Pattanaik Ramswarup

AI Engineer & Dataset Architect | Creator of the 77,000 Training Dataset

I've personally trained over 50 AI models from scratch and spent 2,000+ hours optimizing local AI deployments. My 77K dataset project revolutionized how businesses approach AI training. Every guide on this site is based on real hands-on experience, not theory. I test everything on my own hardware before writing about it.

✓ 10+ Years in ML/AI✓ 77K Dataset Creator✓ Open Source Contributor
GitHubLinkedInTwitter
📅 Published: October 28, 2025🔄 Last Updated: March 16, 2026✓ Manually Reviewed

Related Guides

Continue your local AI journey with these comprehensive guides

View All Local AI Guides
Free Tools & Calculators